In this study an attempt has been made to investigate the transformative role of technology in historical and archaeological research, highlighting how innovations such as remote sensing, 3D modelling, data analysis, and artificial intelligence have revolutionized traditional methodologies. Employing an exploratory research design, the paper synthesizes qualitative and quantitative sources, including literature reviews, case studies, and expert interviews. It explores how tools like LiDAR and isotopic analysis have enabled the discovery of hidden sites and provided insights into ancient lifeways. The study also addresses ethical concerns related to data ownership, cultural heritage preservation, and community engagement. While technology enhances research capabilities and interdisciplinary collaboration, challenges remain, including limited technical expertise, funding constraints, and access to specialized equipment. The research emphasizes best practices in data management, training, and ethical standards and offers strategic recommendations for researchers, institutions, and policymakers.
Bonacchi, C., & Bevan, A. (2018). The heritage of Brexit: Roles of the past in the construction of political identities through social media. Journal of Social Archaeology, 18(2), 174-192.Chase, A. F., Chase, D. Z., Weishampel, J. F., Drake, J. B., Shrestha, R. L., Slatton, K. C., ... & Carter, W. E. (2012). Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(2), 387-398.Denard, H. (2012). A new introduction to the London Charter. In Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage (pp. 57-71). Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.Evans, D. H., Fletcher, R. J., Pottier, C., Chevance, J. B., Soutif, D., Tan, B. S., ... & Hensley, S. (2013). Uncovering archaeological landscapes at Angkor using lidar. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(31), 12595-12600.Faniel, I., Kansa, E., Whitcher Kansa, S., Barrera-Gomez, J., & Yakel, E. (2013). The challenges of digging data: A study of context in archaeological data reuse. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 295-304).Hamilakis, Y. (2018). Sensorial assemblages: Affect, memory, and temporality in assemblage thinking. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 28(1), 77-102.Huggett, J. (2017). The apparatus of digital archaeology. Internet Archaeology, 44(1), 1-9.Huvila, I. (2008). Participatory archive: Towards decentralised curation, radical user orientation, and broader contextualisation of records management. Archival Science, 8(1), 15-36.Jeffrey, S. (2015). Challenging heritage visualisation: Beauty, aura and democratisation. Open Archaeology, 1(1), 144-152.Kansa, E. C., & Kansa, S. W. (2018). Data beyond the archive in digital archaeology: An introduction. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 6(2), 89-97.Kersten, T. P., & Lindstaedt, M. (2012). Image-based low-cost systems for automatic 3D recording and modelling of archaeological finds and objects. In Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation (pp. 1-10). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 1097-1105).Liarokapis, F., Kouřil, P., Agrafiotis, P., Demesticha, S., Chmelík, J., & Skarlatos, D. (2017). 3D modelling and mapping for virtual exploration of underwater archaeology assets. International Journal of Nautical Archaeology, 46(2), 391-403.Menna, F., Nocerino, E., Scamardella, A., & Remondino, F. (2016). Reverse engineering and 3D modeling for digital documentation of cultural heritage. In Digital Techniques for Documenting and Preserving Cultural Heritage (pp. 47-72). Arc Humanities Press.Opitz, R. (2017). An experiment in using visual attention metrics to think about experience and design choices in past places. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24(4), 978-1004.Opitz, R., & Cowley, D. (2013). Interpreting archaeological topography: 3D data, visualisation and observation. Oxbow Books.Perry, S., & Beale, G. (2015). The social web and archaeology’s restructuring: Impact, exploitation, disciplinary change. Open Archaeology, 1(1), 153-165.Perry, S., & Taylor, J. S. (2018). Theorising the digital archaeological body. In The Routledge Handbook of Sensory Archaeology (pp. 629-641). Routledge.Price, T. D., Frei, K. M., Dobat, A. S., Lynnerup, N., & Bennike, P. (2015). Who was in Harold Bluetooth's army? Strontium isotope investigation of the cemetery at the Viking Age fortress at Trelleborg, Denmark. Antiquity, 85(328), 476-489.Richards, J. D. (2017). Digital archives and discoveries in world archaeology. World Archaeology, 49(5), 639-650.Roosevelt, C. H., Cobb, P., Moss, E., Olson, B. R., & Ünlüsoy, S. (2015). Excavation is destruction digitization: Advances in archaeological practice. Journal of Field Archaeology, 40(3), 325-346.Roussou, M., & Drettakis, G. (2003). Photorealism and non-photorealism in virtual heritage representation. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australasia and South East Asia (pp. 1-6).Schwarcz, H. P., & Schoeninger, M. J. (2011). Stable isotopes of carbon and nitrogen as tracers for paleo-diet reconstruction. In Developments in Quaternary Sciences (Vol. 4, pp. 725-742). Elsevier.
